Where REDD+ money goes – and doesn’t go
- From
-
Published on
05.06.18
- Impact Area

REDD+ financing’s annual average of USD 323 million might sound like a lot on its own, but compare this to the 41 billion spent on agricultural subsidies and biofuel, and it’s just a drop in the bucket.
This is one of many findings elucidated in a forthcoming study on funding for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). The study was led by the international consulting group COWI, along with the Öko-Institut and scientists from the Center for the International Forestry Research (CIFOR). The team studied REDD+ funding from 2008–2015 to see where it went and how it was spent. Read the full story on Forests News.
Related news
-
Over 1,000 Farmers in Kenya’s Semi-Arid Regions Trained in Climate-Smart Innovations
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)08.04.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
The Accelerating Impacts of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa (AICCRA) project is transforming far…
Read more -
-
Building IP Capacity Across Nations: ICRISAT’s South-South Training Sparks Cross-Country Learning
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)03.04.25-
Gender equality, youth & social inclusion
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
The International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), under the Indian Tec…
Read more -
-
Ukama Ustawi: From Field to Future: 10 Partnership Secrets Behind Ukama Ustawi’s Success
Scaling for Impact Program01.04.25-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
“If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go…
Read more -