Competitive elections are good for democracy – just not every democracy
- From
-
Published on
04.01.19
- Impact Area
-
Funders
United States of America

The 2018 U.S. midterm elections were fierce, expensive and full of upsets, with political newcomers ousting long-tenured incumbents and Democrats unseating Republicans to retake the House of Representatives.
That makes them an exemplary democratic exercise from a political science standpoint: American voters booted the congressional representatives who they believed did not fight for their interests.
That’s exactly what elections are meant to do: Hold politicians accountable.
But it doesn’t work that way everywhere. In younger democracies, our research shows, a superheated campaign with numerous candidates may actually impede democracy.
Photo: Marco Dormino/UN
Related news
-
SAAF session at CGIAR Science Week reimagines the transformation of animal and aquatic food systems for a sustainable future
Sustainable Animal and Aquatic Foods Science Program05.05.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Event summary On 9 April 2025, during the CGIAR Science Week in Nairobi, the Sustainable…
Read more -
-
Liberia Showcases Climate-Resilient Rice Varieties to Boost National Food Security
AfricaRice02.05.25-
Gender equality, youth & social inclusion
-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Suakoko, Bong County, Liberia — In a significant stride toward bolstering Liberia’s food and nut…
Read more -
-
Inclusive Delivery unpacks pathways to strengthen seed systems for smallholder farmers
CGIAR Initiative on Seed Equal29.04.25-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
At an engaging side event hosted by CGIAR’s Breeding for Tomorrow Science Program, stakeholders fr…
Read more -